Completion
Impact and transparency
The impact question is whether SafeRide changes workflows without creating new risk.
The repo shows product readiness, but impact still depends on field evidence: completion, comprehension, privacy confidence, referral usefulness, route action, and backend safety.
Measure behaviour, not hype.
A responsible pilot should track whether women can safely start reports, understand consent, use legal/support content, preserve evidence, and whether partners act on aggregate route signals.
Trust
user confidence in consent and data controls
Action
operator or support response to route patterns
Repo-backed detail
Evidence reviewers can inspect.
Usability
Measure whether the flow works under stress.
Completion, abandonment, comprehension, and recovery from offline states matter more than broad claims about safety outcomes.
Safeguarding
Measure whether guidance stays within boundaries.
Tips, referrals, and assistant responses should be reviewed for overpromising, unsafe escalation, and unclear data-sharing language.
Accountability
Measure whether partners actually change routes.
The Route Safety Index should be judged by partner response and corrective action, not only by data collection.
Product evidence
Measure whether the draft, evidence, legal framing, pathway, consent, and case tracker screens are usable under low-signal and high-stress conditions.
Safeguarding evidence
Review whether tips, provider choices, referral briefs, and AI guidance avoid overpromising and point users toward qualified human support.
Infrastructure evidence
Publish what changed as SafeRide moves from Supabase prototype infrastructure to a first-party API with production-grade controls.
Transparency commitments
- 01Separate repo-complete features from field-validated outcomes.
- 02Report unresolved risks around evidence encryption, backend migration, CI debt, and content review.
- 03Use privacy-safe analytics only when approved and never capture incident details in analytics.
- 04Publish non-sensitive pilot learnings, methodology limits, and corrective actions.
Ready to help make the next route safer?
Review the safety model